Is the 29 / 27.5 combo (97.5) bike here to stay?

Verbl Kint
Posts
564
Joined
9/13/2013
Location
Quezon City PH
Edited Date/Time 6/10/2020 12:50am
"Business in front, party in the back!"

The UCI reversed its policy of banning mixed wheelsizes late last year for DH and Enduro. Within weeks, several teams experimented pairing a 29" front wheel with a 27.5" rear wheel, notably, Specialized, GT, and Polygon. Neko Mullaly tested a reverse mullet build on his Tues, 2 years after trying it out on his old Gambler "Frankenbike".

In recent times, there have been a few intrepid manufacturers who actually designed and released 97.5 gravity bikes, like Foes and Liteville. Reviews were generally positive but no discernible data has been released comparing it to bikes with same-sized wheels.

Is the 97.5 bike a true game-changer? Will it only fit specific riders and/or riding styles? Will a 97.5 bike ever win the World Cup overall or the EWS?
Poll

Will a 97.5 bike ever win a World Cup or an EWS Round?

Choices
12
1
|
sspomer
Posts
4235
Joined
6/26/2009
Location
Boise, ID US
3/22/2019 9:24am
rad question and poll! visually, i can't stand the look of them, but finn's drift and result at crankworx yesterday was pretty darn rad. i voted yes, we'll see a win at some point. here's maes' 97.5 bike from NZ enduro, too.


4
3/22/2019 9:45am

I believe that for a while there will be 97.5, but in the long run I find it difficult, much easier for the industry to make only 29 items available than the two models. I believe bikes 29 are complete and the difference of 97.5 is not relevant. We'll see.
4
1
3/22/2019 10:11am
The combo will never stick. Just something new and shiny but the glimmer will tarnish.
4
2
Mwood
Posts
86
Joined
8/19/2009
Location
Bay Area, CA US
3/22/2019 10:36am
It's bikes. They will go fast under fast people. Having ridden both a 29/27.5 and a 27.5/26 I think they ride fine.
12
tubeofcaulk
Posts
4
Joined
12/8/2016
Location
Chesterfield, MO US
3/22/2019 11:24am
I’ve really enjoyed the recent crop of longer travel 29ers. My only issue is that at 5’10 but with a VERY short inseam (<30”), i buzz the tire on steeps quite easily (which also occasionally happens at seams on big rock slabs for me, as well).

I’d like to see theability to run a 27.5 rear if possible.
1
3/22/2019 11:53am
I’ve really enjoyed the recent crop of longer travel 29ers. My only issue is that at 5’10 but with a VERY short inseam (<30”), i buzz...
I’ve really enjoyed the recent crop of longer travel 29ers. My only issue is that at 5’10 but with a VERY short inseam (<30”), i buzz the tire on steeps quite easily (which also occasionally happens at seams on big rock slabs for me, as well).

I’d like to see theability to run a 27.5 rear if possible.
I have a similar issue on my Sentinel (I'm 5'9" with a similar inseam). However, I think there are a few things that mitigate this. Longer reach figures, which put you more central on the bike (as opposed to the hanging off the back that comes with short reaches) and longer chainstays, which also allow for a more neutral position for similar reasons.That said, while I do buzz every once and while, I don't really find it to be a major problem. I've never buzzed my rear wheel and had any real issue as a result, other than being somewhat surprised/distracted for a couple seconds.
dirtworks911
Posts
11
Joined
4/9/2012
Location
St. George, UT US
3/22/2019 12:34pm
The real question is do you throw a 29" front wheel on a 27.5" frame or a 27.5" rear wheel on a 29" frame? Both have pros and cons.
10
3/22/2019 12:47pm
I trust whatever Neko says implicitly. And he’s already told me and the rest of instaland “meh”. In all seriousnous I don’t think it’s gonna stick around for long, maybe not even long enough to score a win and even if somebody does get a win it won’t be cus they’ve found the new magic formula of wheel sizes.
2
Darth_Sloth
Posts
60
Joined
12/23/2018
Location
Los Angeles, CA US
3/22/2019 1:03pm
I think we'll just need to wait until the 1st of September at the latest to see a win on one, if Bruni keeps riding the Specialized that is....
2
Eoin
Posts
188
Joined
3/6/2015
Location
FR
3/22/2019 2:32pm
It seems unlikely that there is much of an advantage over going full 29er for racing.

Personally I'm considering running the mismatched wheels on an enduro bike, but more for practical reasons: use a high end 29er wheel for longer rides and racing, but a lower end 27.5 wheel and DH tyre for shuttles and bike park. DH tyres and strong wheels have a pretty high weight penalty in 29.
1
cmkneeland
Posts
48
Joined
12/15/2013
Location
Franklin, NH US
3/22/2019 3:10pm
Smaller wheelsizes ride so much better. And the 29ers still aren't winning the series. Wth are we doing with these things? Get rid of the bitch wheels already.
2
13
oliosky
Posts
54
Joined
10/31/2016
Location
Washington, DC US
3/22/2019 4:28pm
cmkneeland wrote:
Smaller wheelsizes ride so much better. And the 29ers still aren't winning the series. Wth are we doing with these things? Get rid of the bitch...
Smaller wheelsizes ride so much better. And the 29ers still aren't winning the series. Wth are we doing with these things? Get rid of the bitch wheels already.
Amaury Pierron won the world cup DH series last year on a commencal 29er.
6
3/22/2019 4:30pm Edited Date/Time 3/22/2019 4:32pm
cmkneeland wrote:
Smaller wheelsizes ride so much better. And the 29ers still aren't winning the series. Wth are we doing with these things? Get rid of the bitch...
Smaller wheelsizes ride so much better. And the 29ers still aren't winning the series. Wth are we doing with these things? Get rid of the bitch wheels already.
oliosky wrote:
Amaury Pierron won the world cup DH series last year on a commencal 29er.
Think he is referring to enduro, you know the racing that doesn't have buffed courses yet. Wink

3
3
3/22/2019 5:19pm
thegromit wrote:
Cecile won the overall on a 29er.
...and Hill and Meas dominated on 27.5.
Personally, I believe tire size has more to do with the person who rides its height and their bike skill than rotation or floating holes or if it carries speed better
2
Falcon
Posts
342
Joined
9/6/2015
Location
Menifee, CA US
3/22/2019 5:31pm
The real question is do you throw a 29" front wheel on a 27.5" frame or a 27.5" rear wheel on a 29" frame? Both have...
The real question is do you throw a 29" front wheel on a 27.5" frame or a 27.5" rear wheel on a 29" frame? Both have pros and cons.
You throw a 29" front and a 27.5" rear on a specially-made frame. And it has an all-new hub standard to go with a new BB size.
3
metadave
Posts
930
Joined
2/15/2016
Location
CA
3/22/2019 5:54pm
I already posted this one before, but again, Exhibit A



1
Verbl Kint
Posts
564
Joined
9/13/2013
Location
Quezon City PH
3/22/2019 6:34pm
The real question is do you throw a 29" front wheel on a 27.5" frame or a 27.5" rear wheel on a 29" frame? Both have...
The real question is do you throw a 29" front wheel on a 27.5" frame or a 27.5" rear wheel on a 29" frame? Both have pros and cons.
Good question. There are limited choices on the DH front (the GT Fury being one) but there seems to be more versatility on the enduro side.

The 27.5 GT Force LTS and the 29 GT Sensor LTS seem to share the same front triangle (probably why Maes is using a 97.5 Force this year).

Meanwhile, the 29 and 27.5 Kona Process 153's seem to have the same rear triangle. Truth be told, my next build is probably going to be a Process 29 with a 27.5 rear wheel.

Guerilla Gravity's recent modular design and manufacturing direction makes it possible to build a 97.5 enduro bike.

Other long travel 29ers with short chainstays and an average bb height would theoretically be good candidates also.
1
Big Bird
Posts
2136
Joined
2/1/2011
Location
Oceano, CA US
3/22/2019 7:03pm
For a while I ran my Santa Cruz Super 8 with 26" front and 24" rear. It cornered like no other bike that I've ever ridden. In a parking lot, I could make a 90 degree turn onto a white divider line in the space of about a square foot. Pre load in, carve the front hard and stomp the rear around. I think it's the future and there will certainly be a podium if not a win.
tuboy95
Posts
6
Joined
4/7/2016
Location
CA
3/22/2019 8:49pm
I think 97.5 isn’t far enough. Need to go 29x26 to really feel the difference. Maybe a Combo with a plus tire.
Krispy
Posts
31
Joined
12/3/2009
Location
Salt Lake City, UT US
3/22/2019 9:07pm Edited Date/Time 3/22/2019 9:09pm
I'm loving my firebird 29 in the high setting with a 27.5 rear wheel, it's just a tad lower and slacker. I certainly like the rear clearance and the ability to pump manual over holes on rough tracks and off ledges. A bit less traction though and a little rougher. The bike has more grip on scetchy off camber with 29's though. If more 29ers had some adjustment it would be more common. Adding a 29 front wheel and fork to a 27.5 throws the Geo way off. I prefer the reverse mullet in terms of manuverability and it's really fun to ride. For shorter riders it's the way forward!
2
peecee
Posts
361
Joined
5/12/2013
Location
Brisbane AU
3/22/2019 11:57pm
I'd love to hear the actual science behind why it shouldn't work ? I understand that one wheel should in theory spin differently to the other but does a bike stay on the ground long enough really to make this unsettle the bike, ill prob get shot down for thinking that haha but yeah very interested to hear the thoughts behind it ?

3/23/2019 12:26am
peecee wrote:
I'd love to hear the actual science behind why it shouldn't work ? I understand that one wheel should in theory spin differently to the other...
I'd love to hear the actual science behind why it shouldn't work ? I understand that one wheel should in theory spin differently to the other but does a bike stay on the ground long enough really to make this unsettle the bike, ill prob get shot down for thinking that haha but yeah very interested to hear the thoughts behind it ?

Not exactly science (I’m really stupid) but when tipped over the smaller wheel will (in theory) turn with a tighter arc than the larger one. Though I haven’t read anything from anyone who’s yet to have felt any affect from this whether negative or positive. I’d imagine this isn’t a good thing...in theory.
Other than that I don’t think there’s any reason it shouldn’t work. It just might not offer any benefits over conventional bikes.
From my own limited experience I thought 29ers grip a bit better in off cambers and obviously they’ll roll better than the 27.5, they get less hung up particularly during slower chunkier sections. So maybe the 97.5 bikes will do better in the Enduro than WCDH events? Personally though I still don’t really see the point but perhaps certain riders and styles will gel with the 97.5s just as we’ve kinda seen with 29ers?
Alex1
Posts
26
Joined
9/5/2015
Location
Athens GR
3/23/2019 12:28am
97.5 is nonsense. It's either one wheel size or the other.
1
4
LLLLL
Posts
283
Joined
8/30/2015
Location
IE
3/23/2019 12:46am
metadave wrote:
I already posted this one before, but again, Exhibit A [img]https://p.vitalmtb.com/photos/forums/2019/03/22/7899/s1200_2003_Specialized_Big_Hit_DH.jpg[/img]
I already posted this one before, but again, Exhibit A



They admitted that the small wheel was a fudge because they got a dimension wrong when it went to manufacturer. Think it was recent a podcast.
1
cmkneeland
Posts
48
Joined
12/15/2013
Location
Franklin, NH US
3/23/2019 3:54am
thegromit wrote:
Cecile won the overall on a 29er.
She also would have won on a 27.5. She rode the bike they want to sell.
1
2
3/23/2019 5:00am
metadave wrote:
I already posted this one before, but again, Exhibit A [img]https://p.vitalmtb.com/photos/forums/2019/03/22/7899/s1200_2003_Specialized_Big_Hit_DH.jpg[/img]
I already posted this one before, but again, Exhibit A



LLLLL wrote:
They admitted that the small wheel was a fudge because they got a dimension wrong when it went to manufacturer. Think it was recent a podcast.
source?
Krispy
Posts
31
Joined
12/3/2009
Location
Salt Lake City, UT US
3/23/2019 6:19am Edited Date/Time 3/23/2019 6:20am
peecee wrote:
I'd love to hear the actual science behind why it shouldn't work ? I understand that one wheel should in theory spin differently to the other...
I'd love to hear the actual science behind why it shouldn't work ? I understand that one wheel should in theory spin differently to the other but does a bike stay on the ground long enough really to make this unsettle the bike, ill prob get shot down for thinking that haha but yeah very interested to hear the thoughts behind it ?

That's interesting. The thing is though, the front wheel turns on an arc as the bars turn and the rear doesn't follow the same path. Also the rear steps out and tends to drift more than the front. Perhaps the fact that the rear wheel is spinning faster and cuts a tighter line would be noticeable on pavement but I can't feel anything unusual happening.
2
Mtbyoda
Posts
1
Joined
3/23/2019
Location
Novato, CA US
3/23/2019 11:05am
Perfect timing on this discussion for me...as I've been thinking about going this route myself. As a rider with a shorter inseam I think this might be the special sauce. However I think you need to keep the changing geo numbers in mind. I think some bikes could get "out of wack" with mismatched wheels. For riders with longer legs I don't see this as a popular option, for all the obvious reasons. I think having 2 wagon wheels will be faster then one if the rider fits and is comfy/confident on it. I also think riding style and the type of terrain you ride most should be taken into consideration.

Post a reply to: Is the 29 / 27.5 combo (97.5) bike here to stay?

The Latest